Frequently Asked Questions

Guidelines for Citing BEA Information | ID: 1004 | Created: Aug-05-2011

How did the recent GDP revisions change the picture of the 2007–2009 recession and the recovery?

The revised estimates of GDP that were released on July 29, 2011, as part of the annual revision of the national income and product accounts (NIPAs) indicate that the depth of the 2007–2009 recession was deeper, and the subsequent period of expansion was somewhat less robust.

The revised estimates show that for the period of contraction from 2007:Q4 to 2009:Q2, real GDP decreased at an average annual rate of 3.5 percent; in the previously published estimates, it had decreased at a rate of 2.8 percent. The cumulative decrease over the six quarters of contraction is now estimated as 5.1 percent, compared with 4.1 percent in the previously published estimates; both the revised and previously published estimates of GDP show that the recession was the deepest contraction since the beginning of BEA’s quarterly real GDP estimates in 1947.

The revisions did not change the timing of the contraction. The overall pattern of quarterly changes during the downturn was similar in both the revised and previously published estimates, though the revised estimates show larger decreases for 2008:Q4 (-8.9 percent compared with -6.8 percent) and for 2009:Q1 (-6.7 percent compared with -4.9 percent). The contributions of specific GDP components to the contraction were similar in both the revised and previously published estimates. (See the briefing on results of the 2011 NIPA annual revision.)

For the period of expansion from 2009:Q2 to 2011:Q1, real GDP increased at an average annual rate of 2.6 percent; in the previously published estimates, the average increase in real GDP during the first seven quarters of the three previous expansions that began in 1982:Q1, in 1991:Q1, and in 2001:Q3 was 3.3 percent (annual rate).

BEA revises GDP during annual revisions because new and revised source data become available that are more comprehensive, more accurate, and more detailed than the source data that were available for the earlier estimates. Some examples of newly available source data from the Census Bureau that were incorporated in the 2011 annual revision include the 2009 Annual Survey of Manufactures, 2009 Annual Retail Trade Survey, and 2010 Service Annual Survey. For more information on the sources of this year’s revisions, a table showing revisions and major source data is available.  Also, an article in the August Survey discusses the results of this year’s revision in more detail.

Recessions pose significant challenges to the accuracy of economic indicators, including those that are used as source data for the early GDP estimates. During recessions, some firms go out of business, some may only partially complete surveys, and some may choose to not respond at all to voluntary surveys. In addition, for BEA’s earliest, or “advance” GDP estimates, some source data are available for only two months, and BEA makes assumptions for the missing data. For example, BEA’s advance estimate of GDP for 2008:Q4, which was released on January 30, 2009, showed a decrease of 3.8 percent at an annual rate, whereas the second estimate, which was released on February 27, 2009, showed a decrease of 6.2 percent. (For more information on the revisions to 2008:Q4, see the FAQ “Why has the initial estimate of real GDP for the fourth quarter of 2008 been revised down so much?”)

The revisions to GDP reflect revised or newly available data from the Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and other statistical agencies. For example, in the annual revision of monthly retail and food services that was released by the Census Bureau on April 29, 2011, total retail sales for 2009 were revised down 0.9 percent, reflecting newly available data from the 2009 Annual Retail Trade Survey. These revisions are also reflected in the GDP estimates for personal consumption expenditures for goods. Similarly, in the benchmark revisions to the BLS employment data that were released in February 2010, total nonfarm employment for March 2009 was revised down 0.7 percent (source), and this revision is reflected in BEA’s estimates of wages and salaries.

BEA judges the accuracy of its early estimates by whether they present the same general picture of economic activity as its latest estimates in terms of long-term growth rates, trends in key components of GDP, broad features of the business cycle, including the timing and depth of recessions, the strength of recoveries, the major components contributing to growth and to contractions, and the pattern of quarterly growth. For information on the reliability of the GDP estimates according to these criteria, see the FAQ, “How reliable are BEA's early GDP estimates and revisions?,” and the recent study published in the July 2011 Survey of Current Business. Compared with other countries, early estimates of U.S. GDP are among the most timely and accurate in the world.

The chart below shows the revisions to the quarterly estimates of percent changes in real GDP for the three most recent annual revisions and the 2009 benchmark revision of the NIPAs.

Percent Change from Preceding Period in Real Gross Domestic Product

(The shaded area marks the beginning and end of the 2007-2009 recession as determined by the Business Cycle Dating Committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research)

Ask us a question...

"How did the recent GDP revisions change the picture of the 2007–2009 recession and the recovery? "
Your email address
Your question
What is 9 + 6? (Spam protection)

Double check that email address! | We won't be able to contact you if it is incorrect.

Why the math question? | This helps stop malicious programs from using this site to generate SPAM email.

Please allow us some time | It could take up to two(2) business days for our Subject Matter Experts to follow up with an appropriate answer to your question(s). Your patience is very much appreciated.

Need Help?

Using the FAQ database | All FAQs are displayed when first visiting the page. They are ordered by most recent or recently updated and can be filtered by keyword search term, by category, and by manually selecting the page number buttons. To view any FAQ, click on the title to open the answer. Submitting a question is done by selecting the “Ask a question” tab along the top of the FAQ.

Selecting an FAQ | Clicking on the title of the FAQ will bring up the answer to the FAQ. Navigating back to the list of FAQs is done by selecting the tab “Latest FAQs”. A tab to ask a question specifically about this FAQ can be found at the top of the answer. Also, the FAQ id and date this FAQ was created or last modified is shown in the upper right hand corner.

Searching the FAQs | Enter a keyword search term and click the Search button to narrow FAQ selections. To return to all FAQs, click the Clear button or clear the keyword search field and click the Search button.

Filtering FAQs by category | Chose the category to filter by and click Apply button. This will display only the FAQs related to an assigned category. To return to all FAQs click the Clear button next to the search by keyword field or select ALL from the drop down menu and click Apply button.